Questions about the compiler and debug information!

linying

Recently, the customer has a requirement that the program entrusted to them should not have a pdb file, but when the program fails, there should still be debug information (such as the number of error lines). Personally I think it is impossible to do it, just in case Come here to ask a brother, is it possible to achieve it? If the compilation period cannot be achieved, what about the implementation period?
(Customers need to do this, because they think that if there is pdb, the program is too large, and then they need to know that if the test fails, that line is wrong! I feel very depressed, but the client strongly requested that there is no way to give them a way what!)

richwolfbobo

Friendship
A little difficult

苹果小刀

If the Release version shows that the number of lines in error is impossible, you can catch the exception and tell the error details in the exception

pronice

Learn from Microsoft
Send back to headquarters if there is an error

If there is a PDB, don't toss people, compile with release

苹果小刀

If the Release version shows that the number of lines in error is impossible, you can catch the exception and tell the error details in the exception

linying

The program is a large-scale ERP project that has been done for 3 years. All the code adds up to millions of lines. It is impossible for all the code to be Catch plus detailed information, and it is impossible to predict what will go wrong. Big!

xing_532

Is difficult, top

wlywly1

This demand can try to let customers understand you.
Communicate with customers.

zhs4276689

I have also encountered

linying

Eh. . . Let the boss communicate with the customer.